| |
State strategies
Page history last edited by Ryan 8 months ago
Here's what some states are doing to improve broadband use and availability.
The list is not comprehensive. It draws from many sources, and leaves out information from the these places:
ALABAMA
ALASKA
AMERICAN SAMOA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
California's Broadband Task Force maps offer household-level information about broadband service availability. The California report contains a series of maps that show where broadband is available and at what speeds. All of California's broadband providers cooperated with the task force to create the maps. Broadband providers in the past have expressed concern about providing such precise information, claiming it would give away their trade secrets. The task force alleviated these concerns by allowing the providers to give their data confidentially to a third-party aggregator.
Maryland's House Bill 1069 would have required any company offering at least 768kbps to report down to the zip code-plus 4 level who has access; the percentage of households that subscribe to the provider's broadband service; the upload and download data transmission speeds that are available to customers in the broadband provider's service territory; the average price per megabyte; and report new services and upgrades to existing broadband service.
California: executive order streamlined the process of using rights-of-way and established a pricing policy for private companies paying for “rights-of- way” access to state roads, and directed state agencies to enable voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) technologies for business and government use, and include broadband conduit in their infrastructure planning.
The California Broadband Task Force report on January 17, 2008 noted that unlike other infrastructure, such as roads, electricity, and water, California’s investment in broadband should not be limited to physical infrastructure, but instead should include policies to increase adoption of broadband technologies. The task force proposed that 75% of California homes should have access to 50 Mbps service by 2015. While acknowledging the positive impact that deregulation has had on private sector incentives to invest, the report also noted that there were unserved areas and that the government had a role to play in funding broadband in these areas (so as not to compete with the private sector).
The report suggests a variety of funding proposals: a bond program and two different broadband grant programs. It also encourages tax credits and expanded use of rights-of-way and increased resources toward broadband research and development.
California also has an Emerging Technology Fund, whose mission is to minimize the digital divide by accelerating the deployment and adoption of broadband and other advanced communication services to underserved communities and populations. The California Emerging Technology Fund is a nonprofit corporation established pursuant to California Public Utilities Commission requirements set by the telecommunications industry mergers of SBC-AT&T and Verizon-MCI.
The merged telecommunication companies will contribute a total of $60 million over 5 years to advance broadband. The CETC plans to leverage the initial seed $60 million by at least fourfold to achieve impact of about $250 million through partnerships and co-investments with private sector, government and foundations.
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
Georgia's Broadband Rural Initiative to Develop Georgia’s Economy (BRIDGE) provides grants for publicly owned infrastructure based on the number of rural counties receiving new or enhanced high-speed broadband services. BRIDGE will grant $200,000 for single-county projects and $400,000 for projects impacting two counties. Regional projects serving three or more counties will not have an award maximum.
GUAM
HAWAII
IDAHO
Idaho created a $5 million broadband development matching fund for the deployment of last-mile broadband service. The state awarded $4.9 million in matching funds to four broadband providers (Verizon, Qwest, SpeedyQuick, and First Step Internet) to provide the equivalent of DSL capability to about 50,000 residents in 79 projects.
In 2001, Idaho passed a 3% tax credit for broadband investment.
In 2006, Idaho created a $5 million broadband development matching fund for the deployment of last-mile broadband service. The state awarded $4.9 million in matching funds to four broadband providers (Verizon, Qwest, SpeedyQuick, and First Step Internet) to provide the equivalent of DSL capability to about 50,000 residents in projects. Combined with the state-funded grants and the dollar-for-dollar cash match from the companies, the $9.8 million investment is enabling companies to provide affordable broadband service to rural communities by reducing up-front costs to the point that rural extensions are economically viable.
ILLINOIS
PROPOSED POLICY FOR ILLINOIS #1 - STREAMLINE RIGHT OF WAY/PERMITTING/PROCESS
OUT-OF-STATE MODEL(S):
Iowa's Railroad ROW law
Requires Iowa's Public Utilities Board, in consultation with the state department of transportation, to adopt rules prescribing the terms and conditions for a crossing. The rules must provide that any crossing be consistent with the public convenience and necessity and reasonable service to the public.
Here's the "$750 rule" -- "...a public utility that locates its facilities within the railroad right-of-way for a crossing, ... shall pay the railroad a one-time standard crossing fee of seven hundred fifty dollars for each crossing. The standard crossing fee shall be in lieu of any license or any other fees or charges to reimburse the railroad for the direct expenses incurred by the railroad as a result of the crossing. The public utility shall also reimburse the railroad for ...flagging expenses associated with a crossing in addition to the standard crossing fee."
OPTIONS FOR ILLINOIS:
-Standardize the equipment attachment process between utility pole owners and parties wishing to deploy wireless equipment -- make rules that apply consistently to municipalities and private companies alike.
-Standardize the railroad ROW crossing rules.
COMMENTS:
---------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED POLICY #2 - FINANCIALLY INCENT BUILD-OUT
OUT-OF-STATE MODEL(S):
WISCONSIN'S APPROACH: Tax Relief
Under the program, Commerce can allocate up to $7.5 million in tax incentives among businesses that will make investments, over the next two years, in equipment designed to provide broadband Internet availability to unserved or underserved areas of Wisconsin.
CALIFORNIA'S APPROACH: Subsidy
Beginning on January 1, 2008, the 0.50% surcharge revenues collected from the CALIFORNIA HIGH COST FUND will now be allocated one-half to the CALIFORNIA ADVANCED SERVICES FUND and one-half to theHIGH COST FUND. This effectively makes the surcharge rate for these two funds equal to 0.25%. The CASF, an expected two-year program, will promote universal service in unserved and underserved areas in the state by awarding funding to qualifying certificated applicant carriers. The funding will be used for projects that will a) provide broadband services to areas currently without broadband access and b) build out facilities in underserved areas if funds are still available. Carrier workshops are expected to be held during February, 2008, to determine criteria and application processes in order for carriers to apply for CASF monies beginning June 2, 2008.
INTERIM OPINION IMPLEMENTING CALIFORNIA ADVANCED SERVICES FUND
OPTIONS FOR ILLINOIS:
-Remove the excise tax on broadband services in Illinois
COMMENTS:
---------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED POLICY #3 - MODERNIZE TELECOM LAW - REDUCE EXCESSIVE, OBSOLETE REGULATION & MICROMANAGEMENT
OUT-OF-STATE MODEL(S):
COMMENTS:
Doug Dougherty: There should be a committment to competition and a level playing field
---------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED POLICY #4 -
OUT-OF-STATE MODEL(S):
OPTIONS FOR ILLINOIS:
COMMENTS:
---------------------------------------------------
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
ConnectKentucky produced the first comprehensive Geographic Information Systems (GIS)-based county-by-county inventory of existing broadband infrastructure and service availability. Due to its success ConnectKentucky renamed itself Connect Nation and is replicating its Kentucky model across the country.
Their broadband mapping and deployment began when the state Public Service Commission chose to command BellSouth to build-out broadband, instead of providing customers with modest refunds due to overcharges. At the end of the first three-year evaluation period for the plan, an audit performed for the PSC found that BellSouth had exceeded its goals. Kentucky regulators ordered that the reinvestment program be continued. Two-thirds of ConnectKentucky's funding came from a general state fund; the other 1/3 is funded by telecommunications companies.
Maine, Arizona, Tennesse, Washington, and West Virginia, have or are considering utilizing the Connect Nations model.
LOUISIANA
MAINE
Maine imposes a 0.25% surcharge --expected to generate between $750,000 and $1 annually -- on all communications, video, and Internet service bills for retail instate service to fund the ConnectME Authority. The fund received $500,000 in "seed money" from the Maine Universal Service Fund. The Authority awarded $787,174 to seven grant applicants.
The Michigan Broadband Development Authority (MBDA) tapped the state's housing authority for money. MBDA received its seed money through a housing authority $50 million bond sale. After that, the MBDA approved approximately $30 million worth of loans.
In 2005, Governor Granholm released the Rural Broadband Initiative (RBI) to expand high-speed Internet access to rural and under-served areas.
Maine's 2005 Broadband Access Infrastructure Board recommended:
1. Providing incentives and funding for broadband infrastructure, noting that the USDA/RUS low-interest loan programs are available but little used in Maine; increasing the awareness of these programs and using state funds to help meet the USDA/RUS 20% match requirements; Creating a new low-interest loan program of its own for broadband investment; and using a mix of tax credits and direct state funding, possibly funded through a bond issuance.
2. Allowing broadband providers to access state towers, facilities, and rights-of-way.
3. Bifurcating the Maine Universal Service Fund (MUSF) into two parts: one section to provide high-cost support for rural incumbent telecommunications companies, and the other to provide funding for cellular tower construction, direct broadband facility construction, and debt service on broadband development bonds.
4. Increasing demand for broadband services through public service announcements, telecommuting programs, enhanced government services available online (perhaps at a discounted rate), and other methods.
5. Providing state grant funding for broadband technology demonstration projects in unserved or underserved areas; developing an RFP process to enable all providers and technologies to participate; creating a Citizens’ Advisory Board that, with assistance from the PUC and the Broadband Development Authority, would develop a list of projects that would be eligible for funding, either in whole or to fill gaps.
6. Creating a Broadband Development Authority that would have rulemaking authority and access to a professional staff. It would be independent of competitive providers of broadband services and would monitor broadband deployment in Maine, as well as maintain and publicize information on broadband availability, demand, and funding mechanisms.
In 2006, Maine created the ConnectME Authority to expand broadband and cellular infrastructure throughout Maine. The statute authorizes the ConnectME to assess every communications service provider an annual fee not to exceed 0.25% of revenue received or collected for all communications services provided in the state by the provider. Maine will use up to $500,000 annually for at least two years to accelerate private investment in communication services including wireless, broadband, cellular, and satellite infrastructure especially in underserved areas.
The ConnectME Authority awarded its first seven grants to expand broadband and mobile communications services to unserved and underserved areas in Maine on October 31, 2007. A total of more than $787,000 has been awarded to the recipients, expanding services to an estimated 14,400 residents. Grant projects are to be completed within one year of receiving the funding. Created under the Connect ME legislation, the Authority contains five members representing the public and private sphere.
Separately, the Maine PUC recently announced an agreement with Verizon to make high‐speed Internet access available to almost 35,000 Mainers who now lack DSL broadband service. The stipulated agreement identifies specific locations where new DSL will become available, increasing to 70% the proportion of Verizon Maine landline customers who will have the option of high‐speed access to the Internet. Under the agreement Verizon will complete that build‐out, using all‐new equipment, within six months.
MARSHALL ISLANDS
MARYLAND
Maryland established the Rural Broadband Coordination Board and Rural Broadband Assistance Fund in July 2006. The board is charged with assisting in the deployment of middle mile broadband communication infrastructure in Maryland’s rural and underserved areas and cooperating with public, private and nonprofit entities to establish broadband communication services. The Rural Broadband Assistance Fund in the Department of Business and Economic Development consists of money appropriated in the state budget, federal money allocated or granted to the fund, and money from other sources accepted for the benefit of the fund. The fund may be used only for planning, construction, and maintenance of broadband communication services in rural areas. The legislation authorizes $4 million per year in funding for fiscal years 2008 and 2009.
The legislation also requires the Department of Transportation to allow the use of any state right‐of‐way for the installation of broadband communication infrastructure provided by nonprofit telecommunications services providers in rural and underserved areas of the state without imposition of any charge for the use of the right‐of‐way.
MASSACHUSETTS
http://masstech.org/broadband/resources.html
MICHIGAN
Michigan enacted legislation to establish a level regulatory playing field for all telecommunications and information carriers, enacting one-stop right-of-way permitting system to create common rules for all carriers and establishing a single tax and fee system to replace differing systems around the state. (See LinkMichigan Initiative, May 2001).
Berkshire Connect in New England is aggregating demand to incent carrier deployment. (See “Berkshire Connect: A Case Study in Demand Aggregation,” MIT
Program on Internet and Telecom Convergence, Nov. 2001).
Michigan's Broadband Development Authority (MBDA) received funding from the state’s housing authority through a $50 million bond sale. It was authorized to issue investment grade, taxable and tax-exempt bonds, the proceeds of which could be used to provide financing assistance. In 2005, Governor Jennifer Granholm of Michigan released her Rural Broadband Initiative (RBI), a program to target MBDA funding to expand high-speed Internet access to rural and underserved areas. Under the RBI, qualifying broadband providers in eligible regions could qualify to receive 4% loans (a 50% reduction of the standard 8% MBDA interest rate) with interest-only draw periods of up to 24 months. It approved approximately $30 million worth of loans. The cable and telephone industries objected on the grounds that the MBDA was funding small competitors where broadband service already existed. The MBDA was not renewed in 2007.
Michigan provides regional planning grants for local communities, encourages regional initiatives to link or leverage their local strategies to the statewide backbone initiative, and encourages communities to identify and remove existing barriers to new telecommunications investment. Michigan established a Broadband Development Authority in part to help localities create viable broadband strategies.
MINNESOTA
The Minnesota-based Blandin Foundation's "Get Broadband" community grant program, supports education and outreach efforts aimed at bringing the benefits of broadband to rural households and businesses. Communities are eligible for funding of up to $25,000 if the community matches the amount of the grant funding. Get Broadband has received $250,000 from the state government.
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
The New York State Council for Universal Broadband will develop a comprehensive statewide strategy to ensure access to affordable high-speed Internet service for every citizen of New York. The council issued a request for proposals to distribute $5 million in competitive grants for research, design, and implementation of Internet services for disadvantaged and rural areas of the state. The goals of the council include:
• Attracting and retaining young professionals by ensuring every New Yorker has access to high-speed, affordable broadband;
• Fostering economic development and building stronger public/private partnerships;
• Creating jobs through innovative community-based digital literacy and technology training programs, including household technology adoption and support; and
• Accelerating the use of state e‐Government services offered through the Internet for residents, businesses, and visitors.
-----------------
In December 2007, the State of New York announced a "Universal Broadband Access Grant Program" that seeks to deploy high-speed Internet service --
100 Mbps service to urban areas and 20 Mbps or higher connectivity in rural and underserved areas by 2015. This connectivity would be neutral and open to all competitors.
Open Infrastructure Alliance (OIA) is coalition of experts covering telecommunications technology issues. OIA offers solutions that would accomplish the state's goals, without raising new taxes or requiring matching state or private investment. OIA's grant submission proposes "The Broadband Opportunity Plan for New York State."
Key features of the OIA plan are:
Part 1: New Revenue Sources to Fund Broadband Deployment -- The State could recover hundreds of millions of dollars from public interest perks given to incumbent telecom companies, telecommunications expenditure overcharging for municipalities, new network revenues, and the state's previous broadband plans.
Part 2: Accurate Data and Analysis -- OIA proposes that the State collect its own data.
Part 3: Design and Implementation -- OIA calls for a comprehensive examination of the successful broadband models to follow and models to avoid.
Part 4: Next Steps to Implementation: A New Vision -- OIA envisions New York, and even the U.S., becoming a world leader in technology and broadband. New visions presented include:
* Lighting up the dark, unused fiber optic wiring today - 40% of New York fiber is not in use.
* Using wireless and next generation spectrum to supplement the wiring plan to provide universal broadband.
* Building from the ground up -- the municipality plan and using public assets for deploying services.
* Opening the networks to full competition -- Is "Divestiture II" or "structural separation" required?
* Innovative Solutions: "Community Clusters", "yo-yo-nets", "stupid network" principles, mesh networks, removing micro-billing, topologies for high-speed access peering points.
* New Areas of Economic Development in New York State; merging video and broadband technology and NY arts.
For more information contact;
Bruce Kushnick, bruce@newnetworks.com
718-238-7191
New York Grant:
http://www.oft.state.ny.us/oft/universalbroadband/overview.htm
Open Infrastructure Alliance (OIA) List of Experts.
http://www.newnetworks.com/OIAexperts.htm
Links to information discussed:
http://www.newnetworks.com/broadbandlinks.htm
See http://www.newnetworks.com/nystatebroadbandanswers.htm
NORTH CAROLINA
North Carolina: In August 2000, the North Carolina General Assembly created the Rural Internet Access Authority, which was replaced in 2003 by the e-NC Authority. Recently, North Carolina extended the work of e-NC for five years from January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2011. The e‐NC originally focused only on rural areas of the state, but now works on developing Internet connectivity in all economically distressed areas. The e-NC originally sought to ensure that 100% of the state had broadband Internet access within three years. The e-NC is a state authority but it is housed in a nonprofit organization, the North Carolina Rural Economic Development Center. The e-NC is a hybrid organization that benefits from funding and collaborating with private entities, nonprofits, national, state and local governments, telecommunications companies, small Internet service providers, universities, think tanks, and others. Since inception, e-NC has issued grants, advocated policies, and conducted research on broadband issues. It awarded $30 million in connectivity grants primarily to counties and to specific government institutions such as libraries, consortia, and private enterprise. All work with e-NC is a unified effort to improve North Carolina’s connectivity. E-NC has received funding from the North Carolina state government, various foundations, and corporations.
NORTH DAKOTA
NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS
OHIO
An executive order establishing the Ohio Broadband Council and the Broadband Ohio Network directs the council to coordinate efforts to extend access to the Broadband Ohio Network to every county in Ohio. The order also allows public and private entities to tap into the Broadband Ohio Network—all with a goal of expanding access to high-speed Internet service to all 88 counties, including parts of the state that presently do not have such service.
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PALAU
PENNSYLVANIA
PUERTO RICO
RHODE ISLAND
Rhode Island's H 7120 proposes to create an "Innovation Center" to encourage the development and implementation of technology infrastructure for use throughout the state. The Center would study technology within the state and recommend strategies for encouraging technology partnerships among state government, local government, private business, and institutions of higher education.
SOUTH CAROLINA
South Carolina: The South Carolina Legislature passed a bill in February 2003 deregulating broadband service in the state. The new law now exempts the incumbent telephone company from having to share its high-speed network with competitors. As a result of the legislation, BellSouth has promised to spend $10 million to expand its broadband network statewide.
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
Vermont's Telecommunications Authority was created by the Vermont Legislature in the spring of 2007 and recently hired an executive director. Its goals are to ensure Vermonters have:
• Affordable broadband to every Vermont household by 2010, capable of delivering speeds of at least 1.5 megabytes per second.
• Cellular service in every community and along main routes by 2010
• Mobile broadband, Wi-Fi or equivalent in every community by 2010
The authority serves as a bridge between public-sector efforts and private sector investments, intends to share in—but not eliminate—the financial risk of these projects, provides a longer-term investment horizon, and supports projects that can become self-sustaining over time. The state can provide the authority with its moral obligation of up to $40 million in bonds to back projects in the first year of construction and possibly more if needed and sustainable. The initial target is to leverage more than $200 million in private sector investment with the state’s backing. Repayment of borrowing for the projects will be based on revenues generated from leasing access to the infrastructure, such as fiber-optic networks and space on towers, or the revenues from services provided over the network. The value of the assets controlled or created by the authority will also help to secure the value of any bonds.
The authority will work to reduce the amount of time and review required for lower-impact wireless facilities in wireless permitting processes at the state and local level.
The Vermont Public Service Board in 2006 allowed Verizon to set rates in excess of its costs in exchange for a commitment to expand broadband availability from 56% of its Vermont lines in 2005 to 65% of its Vermont lines by 2007, 75% by 2008, 77% by 2009, and 80% by 2010. The commitment requires Verizon to expand an unregulated service, broadband Internet access, in areas that it did not find sufficient market motivation to serve prior to the commitment.
Vermont's Broadband Grant Program, which provides grants in increments of up to $50,000, has granted $550,000 over the past three years. The program favors projects that bring last-mile connectivity to unserved areas of Vermont. Grants are issued to towns where the private market is unlikely to provide broadband services.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
VIRGINIA
In 2005, Virginia became the first state to use tobacco settlement funds to build open-access broadband network. The Southside Regional Broadband Initiative (previously called the Regional Backbone/Roots of Progress) is using $12 million in state funds to build a 700-mile fiber-optic network connecting five cities, 20 counties and 56 industrial parks in southern Virginia. The purpose of this investment is to ignite commerce and economic growth in the region by allowing communities to more effectively compete for new jobs, attract technology-based industry and retain skilled labor.
Also, in June 2007, the Mid-Atlantic Broadband Cooperative (MBC), in conjunction with the Virginia Tobacco Commission (VTC), awarded five projects to private sector broadband providers to test various approaches for enabling broadband expansion in rural markets. The VTC provided $1 million in 50% matching capital funds to encourage private sector telecommunications companies to invest in infrastructure to serve the last mile. As a result of this program, over 7,000 households and businesses will have access to advanced high-speed Internet services provided by private sector telecom companies.
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
West Virginia's legislature passed the ETOPIA bill, Senate Bill 748, but the Governor vetoed it. If enacted, the bill would have created a think-tank to explore best-practices for creating public-private broadband partnerships. The bill would have given county and municipal governments authority to create public-private partnerships to provide cable, telecommunications, wireless and broadband Internet network services. The state would issue bonds to initially fund the technology infrastructure. The long-term goal for ETOPIA legislation is for the infrastructure to become a revenue stream and not be maintained by state tax dollars.
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
OTHER
California, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, and Vermont have bodies to focus on broadband.
Set a goal for broadband adoption/availability: California, Kentucky, Maine, New York, North Carolina, and Vermont.
Creation of a new body focusing on broadband: California, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, and Vermont.
Funding broadband access with grants or low‐interest loans: California, Georgia, Idaho, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Vermont.
Regulatory bargains: telephone companies have been required to deploy greater broadband in return for reduced regulatory requirements: California, Illinois, Maine, and Vermont.
Streamlining uses of rights-of‐way (both state and municipal): California, Maine, and Maryland.
Public-private cooperation: California, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, New York, North Carolina, and Virginia.
Mapping of broadband facilities: California and Kentucky.
E-awareness: educating communities of the importance and/or availability of broadband to increase adoption: California, Maine, New York, and North Carolina.
Tax credits for investments in broadband facilities: California, Wisconsin and Idaho.
Focus on extending middle-mile fiber connectivity: Maryland, Ohio, and Virginia.
State strategies
|
|
Tip: To turn text into a link, highlight the text, then click on a page or file from the list above.
|
|
|
|
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.